Friday, September 22, 2006
Advance tax payment of 8 Sensex firms up 400% in Q2
MUMBAI, SEPT 21: Commodity prices, along with interest rates, have been sources of pressure in the recent past. But that hardly seems to have affected India Inc in any way, if the recent advance tax payment figures of major Indian companies are any indication.
A total of eight companies that constitute nearly 20% of the benchmark Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) Sensex have reported an average rise of more than 400% in their advance tax payment in September 2006, compared with the corresponding quarter of the last financial year. Sources said, while ACC has reported a massive rise of 2,400% in its advance tax payment at Rs 125 crore, Gujarat Ambuja Cements’ payment shot up by 500% at Rs 120 crore. Metal majors Tata Steel and Hindalco Industries have paid advance tax of Rs 450 crore (up 80%) and Rs 230 crore (up 70%), respectively, in September 2006. Other Sensex constituents, Grasim Industries, Bajaj Auto, L&T and Tata Motors, have also seen a rise in advance tax payment in a range of 14% to 94%.
Experts say the biggest rise has been seen in some of the old economy companies as they are also related to the infrastructure sector, on an upswing in the recent past.
The total advance tax payment of 12 companies (data available with FE), constitutes nearly 9% of the total countrywide payment, pegged at Rs 21,593 crore. Advance tax paid by corporates and individuals rose 32.6% by mid-September underscoring the economic buoyancy.
source:-Financial times
A total of eight companies that constitute nearly 20% of the benchmark Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) Sensex have reported an average rise of more than 400% in their advance tax payment in September 2006, compared with the corresponding quarter of the last financial year. Sources said, while ACC has reported a massive rise of 2,400% in its advance tax payment at Rs 125 crore, Gujarat Ambuja Cements’ payment shot up by 500% at Rs 120 crore. Metal majors Tata Steel and Hindalco Industries have paid advance tax of Rs 450 crore (up 80%) and Rs 230 crore (up 70%), respectively, in September 2006. Other Sensex constituents, Grasim Industries, Bajaj Auto, L&T and Tata Motors, have also seen a rise in advance tax payment in a range of 14% to 94%.
Experts say the biggest rise has been seen in some of the old economy companies as they are also related to the infrastructure sector, on an upswing in the recent past.
The total advance tax payment of 12 companies (data available with FE), constitutes nearly 9% of the total countrywide payment, pegged at Rs 21,593 crore. Advance tax paid by corporates and individuals rose 32.6% by mid-September underscoring the economic buoyancy.
source:-Financial times
Thursday, September 21, 2006
ICICI BANK PENNANT
Wednesday, September 20, 2006
THE GOLD, OIL AND US DOLLAR RELATIONSHIP
Of the various vulnerabilities traditional financial assets are exposed to, a rising oil
price is of particular concern. In 2004, oil hit an all-time high of $56 per barrel, up 366
percent from the $12 low of 1998, and up 75 percent since January 2004.
Generally speaking, an increasing oil price results in increasing inflation, negatively
impacting the global economy, particularly oil-dependent economies such as the
US. Apart from increased transportation, heating and utility costs, higher oil prices are
eventually reflected in virtually every finished product, as well as food and
commodities in general. Furthermore, there is evidence that global oil production is
peaking and the flow will soon be in permanent decline.
The US has enjoyed inexpensive oil-based energy for nearly a century, and this is one
of the prime factors behind the unprecedented prosperity of its economy in the 20th
century. While the US accounts for only 5 percent of the world's population, it
consumes 25 percent of the world's fossil fuel-based energy. It imports about 75
percent of its oil, but owns only 2 percent of world reserves. Because of this
dependency on both oil and foreign suppliers, any increases in price or supply
disruptions will negatively impact the US economy to a greater degree than any
other nation.
The majority of oil reserves are located in politically unstable regions, with tensions in
the Middle East, Venezuela and Nigeria likely to intensify rather than to abate.
Because of frequent terrorist attacks, Iraqi oil production is subject to disruption, while
the risk of political problems in Saudi Arabia grows. The timing for these risks is
uncertain and hard to quantify, but the implications of Peak Oil are predictable and
quantifiable, and the effects will be more far-reaching than simply a rising oil price.
In the early 1950s, M. King Hubbert, one of the leading geophysicists of the time,
developed a predictive model showing that all oil reserves follow a pattern called
Hubbert’s Curve, which runs from discovery through to depletion. In any given oil
field, as more wells are drilled and as newer and better technology is installed,production initially increases. Eventually, however, regardless of new wells and newtechnology, a peak output is reached. After this peak is reached, oil production notonly begins to decline, but also becomes less cost effective. In fact, at some point inthis decline, the energy it takes to extract, transport and refine a barrel of oil exceeds
the energy contained in that barrel of oil. When that point is reached, extraction ofoil is no longer feasible and the reserve is abandoned. In the early years of the 20th century, in the largest oil fields, it was possible to recover 50 barrels of oil for eachbarrel used in the extraction, transportation and refining process. Today that 50-to-1ratio has declined to 5-to-1 or less. And it continues to decline. read more here gold oil crude
price is of particular concern. In 2004, oil hit an all-time high of $56 per barrel, up 366
percent from the $12 low of 1998, and up 75 percent since January 2004.
Generally speaking, an increasing oil price results in increasing inflation, negatively
impacting the global economy, particularly oil-dependent economies such as the
US. Apart from increased transportation, heating and utility costs, higher oil prices are
eventually reflected in virtually every finished product, as well as food and
commodities in general. Furthermore, there is evidence that global oil production is
peaking and the flow will soon be in permanent decline.
The US has enjoyed inexpensive oil-based energy for nearly a century, and this is one
of the prime factors behind the unprecedented prosperity of its economy in the 20th
century. While the US accounts for only 5 percent of the world's population, it
consumes 25 percent of the world's fossil fuel-based energy. It imports about 75
percent of its oil, but owns only 2 percent of world reserves. Because of this
dependency on both oil and foreign suppliers, any increases in price or supply
disruptions will negatively impact the US economy to a greater degree than any
other nation.
The majority of oil reserves are located in politically unstable regions, with tensions in
the Middle East, Venezuela and Nigeria likely to intensify rather than to abate.
Because of frequent terrorist attacks, Iraqi oil production is subject to disruption, while
the risk of political problems in Saudi Arabia grows. The timing for these risks is
uncertain and hard to quantify, but the implications of Peak Oil are predictable and
quantifiable, and the effects will be more far-reaching than simply a rising oil price.
In the early 1950s, M. King Hubbert, one of the leading geophysicists of the time,
developed a predictive model showing that all oil reserves follow a pattern called
Hubbert’s Curve, which runs from discovery through to depletion. In any given oil
field, as more wells are drilled and as newer and better technology is installed,production initially increases. Eventually, however, regardless of new wells and newtechnology, a peak output is reached. After this peak is reached, oil production notonly begins to decline, but also becomes less cost effective. In fact, at some point inthis decline, the energy it takes to extract, transport and refine a barrel of oil exceeds
the energy contained in that barrel of oil. When that point is reached, extraction ofoil is no longer feasible and the reserve is abandoned. In the early years of the 20th century, in the largest oil fields, it was possible to recover 50 barrels of oil for eachbarrel used in the extraction, transportation and refining process. Today that 50-to-1ratio has declined to 5-to-1 or less. And it continues to decline. read more here gold oil crude
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)